“That they all may be one, as thou, Father, in me, and I in thee; that they also may be one in us; that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.”
John 17.21
“Then he shall say to them also that shall be on his left hand: Depart from me, you cursed, into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels.”
Matthew 25.41
One of the most fundamental results of the Judgement is that we will be united for eternity with those to whom we have united ourselves while on this earth. How then, does one expect to be united in Almighty God, with the very Saints whose teachings one has already rejected? Certainly, it will not be so.
The Teachings of the Saints, and especially the Doctors of the Church, are key to the Teachings of the Church, and our Understanding of the same. And so, by uniting ourselves to these teachings we unite ourselves to the Church, and the same Saints which currently enjoy the True Unity of the Beatific Vision, and who intercede for us before Almighty God. But when we reject these Teachings, we separate ourselves from and invert this Unity: we separate ourselves from the Communion of Saints. This general practice of rejecting the teachings of the Saints is one of the pillars of the modernist “catholic” church, and has now infiltrated even to those who claim to hold onto Tradition, and the true Teachings of the Church. And through this inversion of Truth, and as a result of the rejection of the Finality of the same, the virtues of Obedience and Unity have been directed to the creature, not the Creator, while True Obedience and Unity have been rejected. This is what happens when we reject the Teachings of the Saints and the Church.
Again: How can one presume to be united for eternity with the very same Saints whose teachings one has rejected? If we reject Quo Primum, should we expect St. Pius V (and all the Saint Popes) to embrace us and applaud our false obedience at the Judgement? Or perhaps what will happen is exactly what is said in the final paragraph of the same Document: “…he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.”
Likewise, to say “Perhaps St. Bellarmine was wrong”, or “Perhaps St. Bellarmine did not have access to all the information” is to reject not only the teachings of the Doctor of the Church, but also the Holy Church Fathers whom St. Bellarmine is drawing his teaching from. It is to say that these Saints did not have Knowledge and Understanding of what they were teaching: which is to say that these Saints did not have these Gifts of the Holy Ghost: which is to presume for oneself the very Gifts one denies these Saints had themselves. Oh, what damnable folly!
It is certain, that in order to say that Bergoglio is the Pope you first must reject the teachings of the two dozen (or more) Saints and Councils (including St. Bellarmine, and the Holy Fathers of the Church), who all taught (in different words) that it was impossible for the Vicar of Christ to be a formal, manifest heretic.
And know this: when you walk over that rolling hill, and through the darkness see that army of demons set in battle array against you alone: you will need the help of every Saint you can get.
Saint Bellarmine was not wrong: Bergoglio is not and never was the Pope. Be careful now, who your soul is united to through silence, indifference, and inaction: For you will be united to the same, forever.
S.M.M.